What is the Purpose of Government?
What is the purpose of government? This question is not so easily answered by the uneducated or the common man. In today’s drastically changing world, responses to this question would vary from person to person and country to country. Some would say, government is here to protect us. Others would say, government is here to provide social services or protect private property. While those potential answers may help us to see individual areas of an overall mission, we must look closer at the underlying principles of government to really answer the question.
John Locke, an early seventeenth century political theorist first referred to a principle known as the “State of Nature.” The State of Nature is a condition in which there is no government. It is a condition of an environment without law. Furthermore, Thomas Hobbes, the original “Social Contract” theorist, advised that human beings in the State of Nature would behave badly, as that state would lead to a “war of every man against every man” and would make life “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
The inherent problem with the State of Nature is that people do not have a device to protect their liberty, estate, or life from others. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the people to unite and form a device or government, to protect their rights as human beings. This theory is further explained by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist #15. He states, “Why has government been instituted at all? Because the passions of men will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice without constraint.”
We can further elaborate on this principle. John Locke in his Second Treatise on Government explains that civil society was created for the purpose of protecting property. In this principle, he examines the origin of the word “property,” which when translated into Latin, means “one’s own” or “oneself.” In this, Locke concluded the purpose of government was to protect life, liberty, and property.
October 30th, 2007 at 4:40 pm
There is little to say except, this current administration has brought about the antithesis of our expectations as Americans!!!
November 27th, 2007 at 3:56 pm
Apart from its other failings and incompetencies the Bush administration is failing to govern by ignoring environmental policy, i.e. not joining the Kyoto protocols, and allowing US industries to run amok. It is unconscionable for industries to harm the environment that we all share. These industries are acting purely in their own self-interest and the government is doing nothing to constrain them, essentially allowing everyone to fend for themselves as in “the state of nature”.
November 27th, 2007 at 5:35 pm
Pearl,
Industries are not the only institutions in society that attempt to promote their own self-interest. Individuals also attempt to promote their own self-interest in society. Self-interest is the basis of the market economy, of natural law, of any number of things essential to governance of society. In fact, one may argue the “state of nature” is what compels one to join society and create government with others - their interest to secure their OWN rights and liberties. If you’re saying that it’s unnatural for industries to promote their self-interests, you’re dead wrong. By buying food, by paying a mortgage, by looking for deals on Black Friday, you yourself are doing the same thing as the industries you condemn. Might wanna think about that.
April 23rd, 2008 at 6:09 pm
It is a bit disconcerting to see it stated that government is beyond the uneducated or common man. For those who hearken to the American form of government such inability stands in stark contrast to “We the people…” and a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.” If as Hamilton states in Federalist #5 man’s passions will not obey reason or justice “without constraint,” then how does man begin to seek such things?” Reason does reside in the hearts and mind of man. Constraint would seem to begin with the natural law that is established and made known to man by his Creator. A natural constraint would then seem to be at work through the broad acceptance and general permeation of society of the fact that a well formed conscience and charity to neighbor promote liberty and justice to a far greater extent than page after page of law. Government cannot and should not proscribe everything; St. Thomas Aquinas admits this in his great tract Summa Theologica, deferring true and lasting justice to Almighty God.
Locke was only one of a number of political philosophers that influenced America’s founding fathers. Baron Charles Secondat de Montesqueiu and Sir William Blackstone were foremost among the philosophers referenced by the founders and were quoted almost two and half times as much as Locke.
At the very outset of his Commentaries on the Common Law of England, which James Madison not only recommended to Congress but purchased copies for it, Blackstone delineated what he called the “natural liberty of mankind.” It was around this natural liberty that government is structured. It is this natural liberty that is to be preserved to the utmost.
The purpose of government is to promote private initiative in a positive manner in furtherance of the common good. This is the foundation of a government that ensures the inherent dignity of man, a dignity made manifest in the character of its free and mature people.
April 25th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
the bush regime as raped this country and will get away with it. what i think is that gov. is so corrupt they dont even care who knows they lie to us and then say trust me they print out money and say here is for the high price of gas and food printing money doesnt solve anything this county is bought no one cares about us (the people) all they care about is how they are gonna make more money for them selfs and all there friends gov. is in place in america in my opinion to run our lifes and tell us what is “facts” and what to beleave and keep us in a state of fear and panic i.e. the terro alert red ornge green this county is embarassing more and more everyday and we the people need to stand up and do somthing about it
May 1st, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Mike:
You speak in generalizations - what are the specifics? And for cryin’ out loud, learn to spell if you’re going to contribute to these forums!
June 12th, 2008 at 7:38 am
To secure certain unalienable Rights endowed to us by our Creator, among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
The answer is from the Declaration of independence
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”
July 31st, 2008 at 5:58 pm
The purpose of government is to protect the freedom of the people.
Freedom is the ability do as you please.
Therefore, within a governmental system you may exercise your freedom so long as it does not infringe on the freedom of others.
It is within this framework that the people are left to define morality for themselves.
In the interest of protecting freedom, it is the job of government to prevent any group or organization from enforcing their own definition of morality upon the people.
I believe that was the type of government our forefathers envisioned.
When was the last time you heard of a politician working to protect your freedeom?
August 18th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
thanks for this site, it helped me understand some of the reasons we have a government. My homework is now completed thanks to this site and all of the comments!!
September 4th, 2008 at 9:13 am
I just want to remind everyone that one of the purposes of government is to accomplish together that which we cannot accomplish alone. In a way, some of you may see that as open ended. It is, because things change over time and require new responses to new challenges. The living Constitution is different from the actual Constitution. The Founders were indeed intelligent people so they wrote a document that would need interpretation for new circumstances. There are things that we could once do for ourselves that we can no longer do. We must now work together or fail. While we argue over the purpose of government and disagree about it we must still get together to accomplish our collective goals and meet our collective needs. I know I have raised questions that I haven’t begun to address but I think the central thing that divides us right now is the question no one is facing head on, namely to answer the question “What should a government do”?